Ten Years on from 9/11

—How our knee-jerk derision of conspiracy theory invites government abuse
John Smith—06/2011
Dismissing alternative theories on the events of 9/11 as conspiracy theory not only excuses the real perpetrators, but gives the green light to government to continue its abuse of the people. It is time we collectively faced the facts.

ON SETEMBER 11 2001, something extraordinary happened: the laws of physics were broken on worldwide prime-time television. And yet, over the intervening ten years since that event, there hasn't been a peep out of the Amazing Randi, Michael Shermer or any other professional skeptic. The official story is that two hijacked planes smashed into the steel twin towers, causing their sudden collapse at near-free-fall speed neatly into their own footprints, the falling debris of which set off a fire on two floors in another steel skyscraper around 100 meters away — Building 7 — which itself bizarrely collapsed at near-free-fall speed, also into its own footprint. This was the first and last time in history that steel-structured high-rise buildings had ever completely collapsed in that manner due to fire.

That terrible day, we also had two other miracles: a third hijacked airline flew into the Pentagon, most of it, including its wings and engines, dematerializing on impact; and a forth hijacked plane crashed into the ground in Southern Pennsylvania leaving just an impact crater and a pile of rubble — like no other plane crash that investigators have seen.

These strange events resulted in the murder of 3000 people in the most brutal attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor. And the shock was so great for the nation and for the world, that very few were willing to pick holes in the official version of events — it seemed just disrespectful to the dead. But now, ten years on, a plethora of well-researched documentaries, scientific investigations and witness testimonies have blown apart the official story — it just does not fit the evidence or the laws of physics. Of course, these are dismissed by the mainstream media as "conspiracy theory", but this should not in any way diminish the strength of these alternative theories in the minds of intelligent and rational people.

After all, history is one long catalogue of instances where leaders and governments have conspired against their own people for their own ends, so why is calling something "conspiracy theory" so dismissive? Just because one version of events is labelled "conspiracy theory" does not mean it is untrue; in fact, if history is anything to go by, it is likely to be more true than the official non-conspiratorial version of events. Leaders and governments, and those who most strongly influence them, have always looked after themselves and their own interests first and foremost, and so they have always acted in secret ways for their own interests — the definition of conspiracy. What is so unbelievable about that? Just look at the number of recent scandals involving politicians caught with their snouts in the trough of public-money.

We cannot blame politicians for this because capitalism is set up on the basis of self-interest, and so we are all programmed from an early age to compete against one another for limited resources. If we don't fight for ourselves and our families, we could end up on the street or on welfare. In this sort of fight-to-the-top-of-the-heap culture, why are we so surprised that our politicians, those who have fought hardest for power and authority, do not always act altruistically, but will often made decisions that are not in the interest of the people they are supposed to be serving? Just because you become a politician does not mean that you are suddenly a selfless saint! Many of the political leaders in Europe, for example, have literally sold their nations into EU dictatorship against the will of the majority of their own people, and have been rewarded handsomely for their treason.

We have to accept that governments and corporations conspire against the people, and that the term "conspiracy theory" is not pejorative but descriptive. However, the mass media tend to present the term pejoratively because to do so is in the interest of the media owners and media controllers who are in bed with government. People who reject conspiracy theory are people who are blind to the abuse of governments, corporations and other organisations, and so governments, corporations and other organisations that want do do things in their own interest that the general public would not sanction make sure that questioning official versions of events and policies is always ridiculed. So if you find yourself generally dismissive of "conspiracy theory", then you are basically an enabler or facilitator of government and corporate abuse. In fact, governments and corporations rely on people just like you to allow them to pursue private agendas.

For example, it was considered "conspiracy theory" that the US and UK governments deliberately misled their own people by falsely implying the 9/11 attacks involved Iraq and that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction poised to destroy the West. However, as more evidence has since come out, it appears that these were deliberate lies put out by the US and UK governments to make the case for war. And the interesting thing is that this is no longer considered "conspiracy theory" because it is the leading theory supported by the evidence, despite the fact that it is still a theory involving conspiracy. Other examples might include the Iran-Contra Affair conspiracy, which ended up being true; and the Kennedy assassination which did involve the CIA.

See Jonathan Elinoff's report 33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True

So it is time we put aside our knee-jerk rejection of anything remotely conspiratorial and accept that governments and corporations do things, sometimes terrible things, against their own people — their own nations. If we can get past the dangerous fallacy that those we elect look out for our interests and safety, then we will be much more effective in holding them accountable for their actions. But if we continue to believe this myth of benign government, we give the green light to those in power to take away our freedoms, in the name of our "safety". Those with power always push for more power and control (power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely), and this tendency is especially pronounced in those with the personality type that lusts after power in the first place — politicians, corporate leaders and other organisational heads.

So we have the situation today whereby our benign view of our own leaders, contrasted by the malignant view of foreign leaders, and our derision of conspiracy theory have resulted in anti-terrorism laws that are being used to control and terrorize ordinary citizens, turning everyone who refuses to be controlled into a terrorist. We have given up the freedom our forebears literally died for through our political naivety, foolishly relegating democracy to something that only happens every few years — on election days.

9/11 was a conspiracy (whether you believe it was a government conspiracy or a Al-Qaeda conspiracy) that resulted in the murder of 3000 people which sparked off wars and sanctions that murdered a couple of million more. The events of 9/11 have NEVER been adequately explained by the official version of events (which is a "conspiracy theory" by definition, one that involves Al-Qaeda conspiring against the US government). This implies that the US government, which has continually blocked an independent academic enquiry, is not interested in having the full truth of events that day being investigated. Of course, this does not necessarily mean that those in government had anything to do with it, but that possibility cannot be dismissed without investigation.

The fact is that group of people most certainly did conspire to create the mayhem and murder on 9/11, otherwise everyone would have known beforehand and the tragedy prevented, and as the official theory (remember it is always just a theory) does not fit all the evidence or the laws of physics, it is out duty as responsible citizens to look at alternative conspiracy theories. And we can start by looking at some of the evidence and footage from this attack with an open and curious mind. If we refuse to do this, then we are acting irresponsibly and betraying our values of freedom and democracy, and our children's future:

 

  1. Loose Change 911 An American Coup [1 hour 38 mins] http://youtu.be/jUGLp5TAVpQ
    (also check out sister video "Final Cut" - http://youtu.be/i3MN9382eGY [2h 10m])
  2. War by Deception 2011: Shadow Government / Ryan Dawson [2.5 hours]
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTx5R67slS0

  3. Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura: 9/11 The Pentagon [43 mins]
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhLhK0HeU6Q

  4. 9/11 — Painful Deceptions [1 hour 23 mins]
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5wkyEDIxTk

  5. The Illuminati and 9/11: As It Happened [15 mins]
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTx5R67slS0

  6. 9/11 Truth: NIST Report Debunked [20 mins]
    goo.gl/gqq1Q

  7. 9/11 Truth: NIST Engineer Caught Lying [4 mins]
    goo.gl/VdBuO

  8. 9/11: Press For Truth [1 hour 24 mins]
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbWQ8ItJB-s

  9. 9/11 Mysteries / 1 hour 30 mins
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQLCYR9iROs

  10. Dr. Steve Pieczenik Interviewed by Alex Jones [2 hours 6 mins]
    www.youtube.com/watch?&v=wjtNiTm99e8

  11. Dancing Israelis Arrested on 9/11- Channel 4 [8 mins]
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=kh3wo18oDZU

  12. 9/11 WTC Attacks by Israeli Mossad / Susan Lindauer Ex-CIA [52 mins]
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MieyIDrkJU

  13. 9/11 Truth: What Happened to Building 7 [9 mins]
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEuJimaumW4

  14. Who Did 9/11? - PhD Kevin Barrett Speaks Out (RT Interview) [15 mins]
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=t36fUenwaxw

  15. 9/11 Coincidence Theory / Spencer Morgan [1hour 48 mins]
    video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5236492071990669218

  16. 9/11 Revisited: Were Explosives Used? [56 mins]
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgSaBT9hNU

  17. Architects and Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7? [15 mins]
    http://youtu.be/hZEvA8BCoBw

 

The above documentaries also show the holes in the official stories of what happened to the other two hijacked airliners — the one that supposedly flew into the Pentagon (a missile is more likely to have been the culprit and not a commercial airliner) and the one that crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania (that looked nothing like a usual airplane crash).

And here are some of the academic/engineering information and organisations that questions the official story of what happened on 9/11:

 

 

Of course, you don't need to watch documentaries or read scientific papers to know that something was not right with the official version of what happened on 9/11. With regards to the attack on the WTC center: those buildings did not look like they collapsed — they looked like they were brought down by controlled demolition. In fact, all the evidence points to this scenario:

  • all three WTC buildings fell at near free fall speed neatly into their own foundations just like they do in controlled demolitions;
  • the buildings literally exploded from the top downwards — the concrete pulverized into fine dust and the steel beams exploding outward;
  • orange particles of nano-thermate explosive has been scientifically verified in the dust from the collapses (see paper above);
  • individuals working in the buildings heard multiple explosions going off both before and after the planes hit the towers;
  • firemen also testified to multiple explosions in the towers, and many of them believed there were explosives in the buildings;
  • molten steel was found at the base of the rubble six weeks after collapse indicating temperatures far higher than any burning plane fuel or burning office contents could ever produce;
  • steel beams were ejected hundreds of feet horizontally as the towers exploded floor by floor, something that just cannot happen in a collapsing building;
  • video of the buildings just before and during collapse clearly show individual detonations going off on floors below the descending collapse;
  • the central steal core comprising 47 massive steal columns running up the middle of the towers exploded into neat 10 meter lengths;
  • photos of some of them showing the hallmark horizontal cuts consistent with cutter explosives;
  • the white light of thermate explosive can be seen in some of the footage taken of the Twin Towers just before collapse;
  • the 47-floor building 7 also fell neatly into its own footprint at near-free-fall speed in a textbook controlled demolition manner, and yet was only hit by some falling debris from the falling towers on one corner, and only had fires on 2 floors. So the damage was asymmetric and yet it came down absolutely symmetrically and ridiculously rapidly. The withdrawing firemen even calmly told TV cameras to keep watching the building as it was about to come down and the owner of the building, Larry Silverstein, admitted on a televised interview that he made the decision to "pull it". This is so hard to explain by non-intervention theories that it was left out completely in the first edition of the official NIST report.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck… it probably is a duck. And if all the evidence points to 9/11 WTC building collapses being the result of controlled demolition… they probably did collapse as a result of controlled demolition.

The official report put out by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) offered the "pancake theory" as to how the towers could collapse just from the fires started by the plane impacts in the top part of each tower. They believe that the floors with the fires on them collapsed, and the weight and momentum of the tower above the collapsing floors then collapsed the next floor down and so in, concertinering the building. They even have a computer model that shows this happening. But just because something can be animated does not make it true — just ask any animator in Hollywood. The pancake theory unfortunately does not fit any of the above evidence, did not fit NIST own experimental tests, and contravenes the laws of physics.

Just looking at the collapse from the point of view of conservation of momentum, floor by floor, without any resistance from steel columns, would result in a collapse time, assuming the pancake theory, of many times greater than the 10 or 12 seconds actually observed. Objects floating in air without any support need force in order to get them moving. Newton knew that centuries ago! Add the presence of movement-resisting steel columns into the equation, both in the core of the building and the shell of the building, and the pancake theory could only result in a halted collapse and not one that gathers momentum. For those twin towers to collapse onto themselves at a speed only slightly slower than free fall defies the basic laws force and momentum. Something had to be removing all resistance from the floors below, both in terms of their supportive strength and their bulk mass, for the towers to collapse at that rapid speed.

www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Journal_5_PTransferRoss.pdf

And as for heat causing the initial collapse, even NIST's own lab testing using a rigged up floor assembly similar to the one in those towers and heating the floor to a temperature greater than that in the Twin Towers showed that the floor supports would not have failed but would have warped only a maximum of 3 inches. It is all there in black and white. And yet, despite showing that heat cannot result in a collapsing floor, they then make their computer simulation of collapse, which in order to work needed them to unscientifically assume a 42inch warping and have the floor supports detached from the central steel core! And this would still have left the steel core poking up the center, not the complete collapse that we all observed. So they fudged the data to make a bad computer model work, but one that still didn't fit the data!

www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Article_1_Ryan5.pdf)

www2.ae911truth.org/downloads/Ryan_Hartford_2.pdf

If the NIST report was legitimate science, you could be sure that they would have been happy to discuss their findings and theories with other scientists. But to date, NIST has refused to discuss any part of their report with any independent academics. They know full well that there are so many invalid assumptions and inconsistencies in their theory that their only chance to maintain some public credibility, and to do the bidding of Washington, is to make computer animations of collapsing buildings (that literally bend the evidence), and keep their mouths firmly shut.

You can even see a video of a lead engineer involved in the NIST report lying during a lecture by denying the presence of molten steel after the WTC collapses. See Video 6 above. And Kevin Ryan, a chemist at Underwriters Laboratories was fired from his job for simply privately questioning the NIST report.

So we know that there is something inadequate with the NIST report, and that the official pancake theory is just not credible in any way. But controlled demolition is a theory that fits ALL the evidence. So it is one that we need to take seriously and that requires an independent review by non-government academics in a court of law with witnesses under oath and with full subpoena power. This seems to be an entirely reasonable request considering the magnitude of the situation, and yet even the Obama administration does not want to touch this hot potato. And so we have an outrageous situation whereby the US government refuses to set up any independently review of one of the most serious terrorist attacks on US soil.

Ironically, it is estimated that $40 million was spent on Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky investigations, and yet only $15 million was spent on the 9/11 Commission [source]. It is clear that, for whatever reason, the US Government, either Republican or Democrat, are not interested in finding out the truth of the 9/11 tragedy, despite the fact that thousands of their own citizens were murdered that day.

Not only is the request for disclosure being ignored, but there appears to be a concerted effort by a number of individuals trolling the internet to spread NIST disinformation in an effort to discredit the 9/11 disclosure movements. And there is also a disinformation site at www.debunking911.com which merely parrots the NIST propaganda, and ignores the NIST contradictions and lab studies. This site supplies no contact details and makes many statements that sound plausible but which, upon closer examination, are clearly contrived. Certain people seem to be working hard to prevent disclosure of what really happened on 9/11.

Aside: Many Americans will not be aware that the official story of the terrorist attacks in London on the 7th July 2005 are also full of holes. It appears that the London bombings might well have been an extension of the 9/11 false-flag operation, involving UK security services and other governments, to foment European support for the US-led war on terrorism.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb_MmqgdCWI - 7/7 Ripple Effect

www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6Vfnn3YZXw - 7/7 Seeds of Destruction

 

Consequences of an Inside Job

Most stop at this point in their examination of 9/11 because admitting that it is controlled demolition is a fundamental first step. But our of curiosity, what would the consequences be if it was proved that the WTC buildings were brought down by controlled demolition?

Those consequences would be HUGE. We would be forced to come to terms with the fact that:

  1. "The enemy" is in our own government and the CIA, not in some far off desert land. (And this probably includes a foreign secret service.) There are many pieces of evidence you can see in the above videos that indicate the Bush government and CIA were in on the attack.
  2. The recent Middle East wars in which thousands of our soldiers have been killed were based on a pack of lies — those soldiers were sacrificed for political expediency (and not for the first time).
  3. The whole obsession with security, including the Patriot Act and TSA groping, is baseless and appears to be a means to consolidate more power to government and get the public used to being treated like cattle.
  4. The millions of Iraqis, mostly children, who died as a result of US-imposed sanctions (which Madeleine Albright described as "worth it") on a country that had zero to do with 9/11 were actually murdered.
  5. The Iraqi and Afghan wars which ruined the American economy but which made billions for a few corporations tight with the US government were nothing to do with defense or security.
  6. The trillions of dollars unaccounted for because of the convenient destruction of WTC Building 7 and the computers at the Pentagon were probably used in ways not in the interest of American taxpayers.
  7. The New World Order the US government and governments around the world are so keenly pushing on the world will only massively consolidate more power in the hands of those who are already abusing it.
  8. The United States is no longer a free democracy because neither of the two main parties has been willing to be honest and accountable, but continue the draconian security measures that erode ever more freedom.
  9. The freedom which defines the US is a joke, as is naming the replacement for the Twin Towers "Freedom Tower".
  10. The United States government is the biggest terrorist organization in the world (along with a certain foreign secret service), and its whole "war against terror" is a camouflage to hide this truth..

How can any proud American handle the above? This is why there is so much denial regarding the inconsistencies on 9/11. Nobody wants to look at these issues because to do so would shatter the illusion of the American Dream and American world superiority. (The same applies to the UK and other Western nations involved.) Nobody wants to feel deep shame about their country and their own political blindness. Far easier and psychologically/politically expedient to dismiss the whole 9/11 thing as "conspiracy theory" and laugh off the possibility that the Twin Towers were brought down by controlled demolition.

This is how the laws of physics can be violated on prime-time television and so few be prepared to really question what they see. But the tide is turning. Most of the younger American generations seem quite aware of the duplicity of their government and the CIA, and their intimate involvement in 9/11, probably because they spend less time being programmed by mainstream media and more time on the internet. And outside the US, there does seem to be more awareness that something is not right with the official version of events. (Of course, it is easier to see the shameful actions of another nation that that of your own nation, especially if you are very patriotic. That is why governments push patriotism, it allows them to literally get away with murder.)

It will not be long before a combination of whistle-blowers (who are already starting to come forward — see video 9 and 11 above) and academics start to persuade the general public that there is the official version of what happened on 9/11 is a lie. When that happens, public pressure will reach a tipping point whereby an independent review of the events of 9/11 can no longer be avoided.

If/when that review shows that controlled demolition was the most likely explanation for the events on that day, then the general public will be forced to accept that it must have been an inside job, due to the need for prolonged access to the buildings to set the explosives. It is interesting to note that the security system for the WTC complex was put in place and monitored by a private security company called Securacom, on whose board of Directors George Bush's brother Marvin Bush sits and whose CEO at the time was Wirt D. Walker III, a cousin of Bush. So this could offer a clue as to how the Bush administration or the CIA under their instruction could have gained access to the WTC complex in order to set up the demolition charges.

When people realize that their own governments through the CIA and possibly with involvement from other secret services, conspired against them, they will demand a whole new era of government transparency and accountability. The whole political system that hides in secrecy for "national security" reasons will be overturned, and the people will demand full and complete accountability of both government AND the CIA, something they should have done years ago. Knowing what happens when governments are left to their own devices will become a stark warning for future generations to stop security being used as an excuse for non-accountability.

So there would probably be a major shake up in the US political and intelligence organisations, and with that the requirement of presidential candidates to spend millions of dollars to be elected which effectively bars anyone but the elite from running for President. This way, America could return to a real democracy, with leaders elected that are in touch and genuinely popular with the people. By lowing the money needed to run for presidency, America could also end the choice-destroying two party system that basically offers the same package in different colours. We could well see the coming of a new and exciting political age.

US occupation of other countries would also likely be terminated as such occupation would be seen to be benefiting not the US nation itself, but certain political elites, the corporations they are involved with (mostly oil, security and weapons corporations), and certain foreign interests. The US would realize that making enemies around the world with its heavy-handed military tactics is counterproductive in the long-term as it makes the world a dangerous place to be in and America itself more of a paranoid Police State. There are no winners in war except those who manufacture the weapons of war, and those who politically use war as a pretext to gain control.

 

Involvement of Other Nations

It was mentioned earlier that two other nations seem to have had involvement in the 9/11 false-flag operation. These are Saudi Arabia and Israel, two countries that may seem at first glace to have very different political outlooks and agendas — one being an Arab nation and one being a Jewish nation. However, they do both share a deep-seated fear of radical Islam because it threatens both of their existences.

Saudi Arabia is an autocratic monarchy (dictatorship) led by a single family — the Sauds — and it has always had very strong ties to the West, particularly the United States, because Western countries have been their best oil customers, and their best weapons suppliers. (You need weapons when you are running a dictatorship.) Despite Saudi Arabia being the birthplace of Islam, home to two of Islam's holiest shrines in Mecca and Medina, and having a population of mostly orthodox Muslims, the Saudi ruling family is afraid of radical Islam because it is a religious nation being ruled by autocratic secular kings and not religious leaders. This puts the ruling family in a precarious position. And as over two thirds of its 18 million local residence are educated, under thirty, and unhappy with the huge disparity in wealth between the richest and poorest, the Saudi rulers are particularly sensitive to anything that could foment a popular uprising for more equality.

It is important to note that 15 of the 19 "hijackers" on 9/11 were Saudis, with the balance made up by 2 from the United Arab Emirates (UAE), one Lebanese and one Egyptian. (Note that none were from Iraq.) Given the huge Saudi involvement in the official story of what happened, why didn't America go after Saudi Arabia and not Iraq? Wouldn't it make sense to go after the country that supplied nearly all the hijackers than go after a country that had no involvement in 9/11? Even the US arch-enemy, Bin Laden, was a Saudi. (Going into Afghanistan does make sense from the official story as many of those labelled Al-Qaeda — who were actually CIA-funded and trained operatives — were trained in that country.)

What is even more remarkable is that after the 9/11 attacks, all commercial flights over US air-space were grounded EXCEPT a number of aircraft that were evacuating 140 Saudi nationals, including Prince Ahmed bin Salman. Why did the Saudis get such special treatment that day? (This question bizarrely was never asked at the official 9/11 investigation.) One major reason for this special treatment is no doubt the extremely close personal and financial ties that the Bush family have with the Saudi ruling family.

Visit www.hermes-press.com/BushSaud.htm for more information.

Looking at the evidence, it is beyond question that Saudi Arabia funds terrorism (just as many Arab states do, although Saudi Arabia has the biggest financial clout), and that it has very close ties to the CIA and the Bush family. The actual issue then is whether this country funded the 9/11 attacks. Unfortunately US intelligence information on Saudi funding of terrorism is classified, at least for another 25 years.

Interestingly enough, those Saudis hijackers involved with 9/11 all got their visas from the US Embassy in Jeddah, where the former chief of the visa section has claimed that the CIA were overruling visa rejections to get Saudis into the United States. Check out the following:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw6YHij-aCU

www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgYFo79q1Ek

www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmjAg_-Vi9Y ( Part 2, Part 3 & Part 4)

So it appears that the Saudi hijackers could well have been CIA operatives being used on American soil. (If you are going to do a false-flag operation in your own country, you have to used foreign nations.)

The other country that is likely to have had involvement in 9/11 is Israel. With its contrived borders, apartheid system and its of brutalization of the Palestinian people, Israel has always been the prime target of hatred for the Muslim world. As a consequence, Israel's secret service, Mossad (whose motto until recently was "For by wise guidance you can wage your war"), has been waging a covert war against radical Islam and Islamic countries since its inception in 1949. This is understandable — they want to survive like everyone does. Mossad, like that of all major intelligence organisations, has a history of violating international law, issuing disinformation (some of which has started wars), murdering its enemies and political manipulation (both at the international and national levels) in the interests of its Zionist objectives. These objectives are further bolstered by the Israeli government's illegal development of nuclear weapons, flouting international law, and its refusal to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. (And the United Nations is powerless to censor Israel because of unconditional support from the United States, which is a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.)

Both Iraq and Afghanistan actually posed no threat to the United States before 9/11, but they were perceived by Israel as posing a threat to Israel. In the same way, Iran does not pose a threat to the United States at the moment, but it is perceived by Israel to be a major threat. What Israel appears to be doing is morphing US foreign policy so that the US ends up fighting Israel's wars, with the blood of American soldiers being spilled for Israeli interests as well as those of the US elite.

www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/06/06/110606fa_fact_hersh

www.dailymotion.com/video/xhebm6_the-truth-about-iran_news

www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzCDdXkwe28

www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qxzZY4JycY

Many believe that Mossad, along with the CIA, was involved in 9/11 because of the strong Zionist influence in the Bush government (see video 2 above). Israel is the only country with the reach into the United States and the expertise in warfare and explosives to have perpetrated the 9/11 controlled demolitions, and the involvement of foreign nationals for their own ends could explain how such an operation could have been kept so secret for the past decade. (See videos 10 and 11 above.) Mossad also seemed to have known the exact time and location of the 9/11 attacks before they happened as they purportedly had agents there filming the towers just before and during the attack. Here are some information sources pointing a finger at Israeli possible involvement in 9/11:

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTkYOhiefRs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hS89vNH-eeY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3t9pkF31wo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5ALv-EbD0c

So it is very likely that Israel had some involvement in 9/11, ranging from knowing that it was definitely happening and keeping quiet (because to do so was in their interest), to full-blown "setting the detonators" involvement. But most people are afraid to implicate Israel for fear of being labelled anti-Semitic. They forget that there are many Jews against Zionism (see links below), which is just a fanatical Jewish political movement that contradicts the teachings of the Torah.

www.jewsagainstzionism.com/

www.jewsnotzionists.org/

www.nkusa.org/

Disliking Zionism, therefore, is akin to disliking neoconservatism or fascism. It only takes on a racial dimension when ignorant bigots reject Zionism on the back of their inherent anti-Semitism, as they reject anything remotely Jewish. But the justified aversion to racism should not be allowed to provide a cover for the inherent evil of Zionism — indeed, any ideology that puts agendas before people. It is perfectly legitimate to reject Zionism on the grounds of the pain and suffering this political worldview causes to the Palestinian people and others in the Middle East and internationally, and the ruthlessness with which it is prepared to meet its goals.

So if you do point at Israel for pursing its ruthless political agenda, be prepared to be labelled anti-Semitic. And if you point a finger at the Saudis and other Arab nations, be prepared to be labelled anti-Islam; and if you point a finger at the US government, be prepared to being labelled unpatriotic and a conspiracy monger. For those who get closest to the truth of what really happened on 9/11 usually get all four labels — they are accused of being unpatriotic, anti-Islam, anti-Semitic AND conspiracy mongers, all in one!

If the Saudis did finance some or all of 9/11, it is unlikely that there would be any repercussions because America is so dependent on Saudi oil. The relationship with Saudi Arabia is more important than the deaths of thousands of Americans and a over a million Iraqis and Afghans (who died due to sanctions and as a direct consequence of the US invasions).

And if the Israeli Zionists had involvement in the 9/11 attacks to draw the US into conflict with Arab states (just as they did when they attacked the USS Liberty in 1967), then it is also unlikely that there will be repercussions because Israel has too many friends in the US and its Zionist agenda is also more important than the deaths of a few thousand Americans (and millions of Arabs). And anyway, the US media has always been sympathetic to the Zionist cause and so any revelation of Israeli/Mossad involvement would not get enough air-time for there to be enough outrage from the American people to demand a stop to US aid (to the tune of $7m a day) and weapons to Israel.

What is more, it is illegal for US companies to refuse to trade with other nations on moral grounds unless a boycott is specifically sanctioned by the US government. This means that any boycott needs to be consumer driven, and that that is not going to happen, especially with oil!

Read: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/34229

 

Oil and the Project for a New American Century

The Project for the New American Century is a neoconservative think tank that saw the collapse of the Soviet Union as an opportunity for American to take over the world. However, it stated that "…the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor."

Its ideas were based upon the so called "Wolfowitz Doctrine", a report written in 1992 by Paul Wolfowitz who subsequently became the US Deputy Secretary of Defense at the time of the 9/11 operation and the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq.

The Project for a New American Century is covered in the following videos:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uT7kcAu4i8

www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhyNwGZA_Cw

www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1usc0ZikMQ

www.youtube.com/watch?v=aepfsJfWxV0

www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Fk6qkHs0oM

What is important to realize here is that we are not really talking about the "nation" of America here, as the ordinary people of the United States are ALSO victims of the American Empire which seeks to turn the whole world, including the American people, into slaves. So the Project for a New American Century is actually a plan by the elite — the bankers, the large corporate owners (especially weapons manufacturers) and the leading politicians — to use the military clout of the United States to take a global quantum leap in their level of ownership and control.

All empires eventually implode as money is siphoned off by the rich and as conflicts abroad take a greater and greater economic toll. This is why the American nation is approaching bankruptcy. But much of the trillions the ordinary man and woman in the street has lost is still in American pockets, just very few of them. There has been a huge wealth transfer from the masses to the handful who control the whole game. And when American does eventually default on its massive loans, the country will fall into the full control of the banking elite, and democracy and freedom will go out the window. After all, nobody who is in debt to another can be free, especially if that other is much more powerful. And you cannot get more powerful than being in control of the US military.

What prevents America completely collapsing economically is the use of the dollar as the Reserve Currency or international trading currency, and specifically, the currency used to trade oil. All purchases of oil from OPEC has to be done in dollars, which keeps the dollar artificially strong, helping to prop up the broke American economy. If the dollar lost its status as the currency of oil deals, the US economy would collapse tomorrow.

Saddam Hussein wanted to start trading his oil in Euros, and so it was important for the US to stamp on that idea as quickly as possible, which is no doubt one of the central underlying reasons why invasion plans for Iraq were actually afoot before 9/11 actually happened. It just needed 9/11 in order to get a war passed by Congress.

www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Iraq/Iraq_dollar_vs_euro.html

www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/the-demise-of-the-dollar-1798175.html

And now, Iran is setting up its own oil trading exchange... which is one reason the US is now targeting Iran under the guise of stopping it using weapons of mass destruction. (The other reason is pressure and disinformation from Israel.) We have heard it all before!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEpp9E6aJGw

Afganistan was invaded because America wanted to control major gas pipelines across the country, and the Taliban were not playing ball.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/oil.html

www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHI203A.html

http://goo.gl/r7Sro

So all the Middle East invasions come down to energy and the control of energy, and the protection of the US dollar as the reserve currency; they have absolutely nothing to do with avenging the 9/11 attacks. Those acts of terrorism were false-flags used by the US to position itself in the heart of the Middle East as the oil starts to run out and America loses its position as economic world leader. It is the desperate attempt of a dying empire to hold on to power — an all-or-nothing strategy in which US lives have been sacrificed for what the elite regard as more important goals.

And of course it is in Israel's interest that America's economy not collapse because Israel receives so much money and arms from America. Without US money and arms it could no longer effectively uphold its occupation of Palestinian land and the abuse of the Palestinian people.

And it is also in Saudi Arabia's interest that the American economy not collapse because oil sales to the US would also crash as few could afford petrol any more, and the Saudis would not have the weapons/intelligence necessary to maintain their iron-grip on their own people.

 

The Bankers

America is a heavy club being used by the elite to bludgeon the world into obedience and slavery.

It is no coincidence that Paul Wolfowitz was President of the World Bank in 2005 to 2007, because ultimately it is the banking cartel who profit from the wars he encouraged. 9/11 would not have taken place without the nod from the elite bankers who saw it as the perfect opportunity to bring "rogue" countries into line under the guise of stamping out terrorism. For as Ian R. Crane, an independent researcher and campaigner for political truth, has said, "they [countries such as Venezuela, Cuba, Libya, Iraq, Iran and North Korea] all have or had one thing in common — that is they are free of debt of the World Bank. They are not locked in the World Bank or the IMF, they have their own banks, they issue their own currency." [source]

Countries that are not controlled by debt to World Bank/IMF are considered subversive to the creation of a New World Order. This is a plan by the banking elite to control the whole world and every individual. It involves the dissolution of national borders and a dictatorial One World Government. Is this another conspiracy theory? You bet, and it is one that is fast becoming a reality.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5E

www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRLPG_HplrA

www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYmjasEXRdE (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)

It is the banking elite that own and control the US Federal Reserve, the secretive privately-own corporation that manages/manipulates the whole US money system. And it is able to do that in its own interest. What is important to note here is that there is nothing "federal" about the Federal Reserve — it is privately owned and controlled.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYZM58dulPE

www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpHp_deaBs8

www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXlxBeAvsB8 (The FED is unsupervised.)

It is the bankers who basically play government, corporations and the military as pieces in a giant chess game that they cannot lose, and which gives them greater and greater control. And they occasionally manufacture booms and crashes to consolidate their position, using their position on the inside to make a killing, often literally. Some people call these elite banking families the Illuminati, but that smacks way too much of conspiracy theory for most people, so I won't mention that word again here.

When the banking elite gamble and win, they keep everything; when they gamble and lose, the public cover their loses and they get to keep their insane bonuses and the foreclosures they generate! This is how the system is set up and how wealth and control is being continuously siphoned off into the pockets of a few.

It is actually the bankers that are ultimately in control of the whole global "War on Terror" game, and they are playing it for even more profit and control, just as they played all side in the previous World Wars. This is why they are so keen to go after oil rich nations: it is not only because of their resources, but because they tend to be debt free and therefore outside of the web of control. And that is what it all comes down to eventually — control.

 

The Insanity of our Social and Political Systems

Some politicians are motivated to help society, whilst of course helping themselves. Most cover an overwhelming self-interest with a thin veneer of public concern. Every now and then they throw the public some small benefits, to keep up appearances. But the laws they push through are ultimately in the interest of large corporations and other non-elected organisations which are able to skew the democratic system with their armies of lobbyists and press agents, generous party donations (political bribery), and private offers of employment to politicians once they leave office (the so called revolving-door effect). If you have the money, you can buy politicians, even in staunch democracies. Any politician who has a "healthy" level of self-interest is corruptible.

Many politicians self-interest is often tinged with psychopathy — a psychological characteristic common to those with the ruthlessness and the attraction to power to fight their way to the top. Those who are prepared to pay any price to gain power and control are usually those who end up in positions of power — as politicians, business leaders and other organisational heads. By not playing by the rules, and having no guilt for the people they "pushed" out of the way to gain power and status, such individuals have a distinct advantage in a society that tries to play fair. Psychopaths have a massive advantage in a non-psychopathic world!

When those individuals do reach positions of real power and authority, they end up following their own agendas. That authority is used for their own advantage. And they will stamp their aberrant psychology and worldview on society in general by the policies they introduce and the worldview they disseminate to the people, through the mainstream media channels that they control. The result is that society itself gradually begins to match their insanity.

  • It is insane to introduce laws like The Patriot Act that erode freedoms and constitutional rights that our forebears literally considered worth dying for. But we passively give them up because we have been brainwashed into thinking that governments protect us and our children.
  • It is insane to have a financial system that puts people's very homes at risk — the mass foreclosures transferring US wealth in the hands of the elite bankers. These financial policies are not in the interest of the people, so how did they ever get passed into law in the first place? When there is a recession, the rich always get richer and the poor poorer.
  • It is insane to live in a society which programs each new generation to focus almost solely on consumption, competition, accumulation and procreation — values which are jeopardizing Earth's ecology and the future of humankind.
  • It is insane to leave health legislation to those in the pockets of the multi-trillion dollar pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry. Since when did industry care more about health than profits? The result is that people get sicker and sicker and need to pay more and more for healthcare. By labelling everyone as having some disorder or another, whether physical or psychological, obscenely profitable mass-medication is going on under our noses… and we do nothing to stop it.
  • It is insane to wage a war against natural health remedies and programs, as the FDA and other government health organisations around the globe do, because they offer competition to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Such policies are literally killing the people.
  • It is insane to have a society that passively sits in front of television screens most of its spare time when it isn't obediently shopping, watching corporate propaganda to persuade people to buy what they don't need and support the very political ideals that are actually against the interest of the majority.
  • It is insane when some earn millions each year whilst others are struggling just to find enough food to feed their families. Who wants to live in a society with such disparity?
  • It is insane to support the invasion of other countries and ensuing mass-murder of their citizens when, in fact, the real enemy is our own governments waging perpetual war so maintain the blind patriotism that allows them to destroy their own people. This just makes the world less safe and turns us all in the eyes of our "protecting" government into potential terrorists.
  • It is insane to give financial aid and sell arms to foreign countries like many of the Arab nations and Israel, when those weapons are so often used for offence not defence.
  • It is insane that the laws of physics can be broken on prime-time television, and the government not even bother questioning it, and the people not demand investigation because… well… it just couldn't be an inside job!

The list goes on and on.

 

Conclusions

The audaciousness of the 9/11 false-flag operation represents an end-game strategy — an all-or-nothing gamble by the elite who stage-manage world politics to enslave all of us under the pretext of "security". (Slavery for security is one of the oldest tricks in the political book — it brought the Nazis into power just as it was used to push through the Patriot Act.)

But the audaciousness of 9/11 is also its Achilles Heal. It was a risk perpetrating such a massive conspiracy on the world stage, in front of the high-resolution media cameras. (Most conspiracies happen behind closed doors and away from the spotlight.) But on 9/11, the world was watching… and watching very closely.

Those who perpetuated it believed that the attacks would be so shocking, and the people so blindly patriotic, that few would question the official story — few would believe the evidence of their own eyes. There will always be a small percentage of the people clear enough question the official story, but they can easily be dismissed as unpatriotic, conspiracy mongers. So the lie continues.

But the 9/11 official story is so weak, contrived and unbelievable, that seeing through it is one of the easiest ways for any individual to start to realize what is actually going on in the shadows. For it offers a very visible thread that, if you pull it, will eventually lay the whole game bare, a game in which all of us have been unwitting players. 9/11 offers Western society, the most important means to wake up from the horrors of the New World Order.

This is why it is such an important event. This is why we must keep pushing for disclosure of what really happened that fateful day. For when as a society we acknowledge what actually took place, we will be forced to accept a most important political lessons:

OUR OWN GOVERNMENTS DO NOT ACT IN OUR INTERESTS UNLESS THEY ARE FORCED TO DO SO BY TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY. WHERE THERE IS SECRECY AND UNACCOUTABILITY, THERE IS ALWAYS ABUSE.

If we refuse to examine the facts and dismiss alternative 9/11 theories as "conspiracy theories", then we become enablers of government abuse and foreign manipulation. Our governments do conspire against us when given the opportunity, and the sooner we accept this fact, the sooner we revoke our membership to the New World Order.

 

Addendum

Came across a great book titled Solving 9-11 by Christopher Bollyn which seems to give a very plausible and detailed possible solution to the whole 9/11 puzzle. Read it online at: www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book.

Also, watch this documentary. BYU physics professor Steve Jones lost his job because he wanted the truth and dared to examine the evidence scientifically:

 

Jan 2013

Thank you to Forbidden Knowledge for alerting me to the following video posted in 2011 which clearly shows that a commercial jet did NOT hit the pentagon. You can actually see the missile in the clips, a fact that clearly points to a false-flat operation.

Also, check out this documentary that ties the whole tragedy together, looking at the who and why of those events on 9-11: