| |
The Joe Cell Breakthrough
Alex Schiffer—1999 |
|
| |
To date, Alex Schiffer has converted four car engines
to run on orgone energy using the Joe Cell Method.
This is a clean and freely available source of
energy that will revolutionize society. Although
nobody as yet fully understands how this process
works, following are three explaination of how
the Joe Cell might work. |
| |
|
| |
An Interpretation using Walter Russel's Theories
"There is a neutral ether consisting of countless
myriads of inconceivably small particles per cubic
centimetre having no electric charge and no mass. Universal
mind places electrostatic charges on these particles
when there is a suitable magnetic field so that the
become charged particles. The complexity of the charge
determines the type of charged particle and its behaviour." Beyond
the Atom, Walter Russel
The above nicely explains several points to the average
reader:
| a. |
As ether, ( Orgone
) has no mass or electric charge it makes it
very difficult to measure. If you read about
the efforts that science has gone to, to measure
gravity waves and neutrinos, you will more fully
comprehend the problems of measuring these "forces".
Suffice to say that just because scientists cannot
measure Orgone energies does not mean that Orgone
does not exist. |
|
|
| b. |
As our Joe cell geometry,
chemistry, electrolysis, location, materials
and experimenters vary from cell to cell, the
Joe cell will thus produces a whole series of
different effects for different experimenters.
The cell can lose weight, cause rain, heal people,
make people sick, "create" various elements
and even do what you want it to do ie. power
an internal combustion motor. |
So, how does a Joe cell "run" a car? Again
I will stick my neck out and suggest an answer that
makes sense to me. Obviously it is a theory and is
only in place until a reader suggests a better theory,
in which case I will remove mine and insert his with
full credits.
Have you ever considered exactly what occurs when you
use a battery for your radio, torch, etc. I mean what
is in the battery that makes your device work and why
does it go flat? There is many chemical and electrical
ways of explaining the process, but I would like to
explain it to you from a slightly different perspective.
Lets set the stage:
| 1.. |
Every unbalanced
action must eventually be balanced no matter
how long it takes. Remember that I have mentioned
in another section of this book the great clue, Rhythmic
balanced interchange. All things in creation
including our battery and the Joe cell obey this
fundamental rule. |
| |
|
| 2. |
Electricity is dividing
a pressureless condition into two opposite pressures
which desire release and thus a return to a state
of balance. So our 1.5 Volt battery for example,
does not want to have a positive and negative
pole and is trying to return to a state of balance
ie. eventually the battery will go ² flat ² the
duration depending on how much work we ask it
to do. |
| |
|
| 3. |
Work is the result
of unbalanced matter seeking a rest in balance.
Notice how we make our battery work for us by
letting it return to a state of balance. JUST
AS IN THE JOE CELL!!! |
| |
|
| 4. |
So the charge of
the battery, ( or the Joe cell ) is a pressureless
condition separated into two opposite pressures. |
| |
|
| 5. |
A charged battery
is dually unbalanced by the opposite pressures
which desire release, exactly as in the Joe cell.
Opposites oppose, they never perform any other
function than to oppose. Opposites are not things;
they are conditions. |
 |
Okay, if we look at the above clues and using the car
battery as an example, we can readily see that the
electrolysis that occurred in the battery when we charged
it via the car alternator has created an unbalance
that is frantically trying to return to a state of
balance. If you do not believe me and if you are foolish
enough, just put a spanner across the terminals of
a charged battery and watch it melt and disappear.
Please don't do it, take it as fact. In like manner,
when we charged the Joe cell, ( which is also acting
as an accumulator ) we have created an unbalanced condition
that is also frantically trying to return to a state
of balance.
A car battery reaches a state of balance by finding
an electrical path either in the battery (self discharge)
or outside the battery in a resistive load ie. turning
your lights on. The Joe cell reaches a state of balance
if you accidentally short the cell when it is charged,
or in the combustion chamber of the car by using the
timed spark plug spark or a similar electronic "trigger" to
allow it to drop to a lower or balanced density (the
state it was in before you forced it to do work). The
result of the Joe cell "working" is translated
into an expansion of the intake air charge and thus
the forcing of the piston down the bore to turn the
crankshaft etc.
|
Now a few words of mine should fall into place for
you. A stage 3 cell is charged ie has sufficient unbalance
to do work. A leaky cell is a self discharging cell.
A balanced or stage 1 cell cannot perform work. To
make the cell work, we must have an efficient transfer
to the point where the work is required, ie. we must
contain the unbalanced condition until it is in combustion
chambers by using the right type of cone, tube, blind
plug, motor and electrical connection.
The Joe cell accumulator is constantly trying to return
to a state of balance and given the slightest excuse
will return to balance and thus be useless to you.
As you build up you familiarity with your cell, you
will find that the cell is constantly giving you small
clues as to what it is doing. As such working with
the Joe cell is an interactive exercise and developing
the skills of a good observer will be highly beneficial.
|
|
|
|
Alternative Explaination 1—Blacklight Power Inc.
The inventor of BlackLight Power's technology and founder
is Dr. Randell L Mills. (For more information visit http://www.blacklightpower.com)
His theory is the existence of previously undiscovered
lower energy states of hydrogen. Mills calls these
lower energy states of hydrogen "hydrinos" and
dihydrinos. This theory of lower energy states of hydrogen
has the potential to change everything that we understand
about physics and the physical world. Now before you
get excited by the above, please realise that Walter
Russell listed many, many elements lower than hydrogen
on the periodic table way back in 1926! Similarly is
we call Orgone "hydrinos" we are back to square
one ie. the massless force that is at the base of all
things. Needless to say, other scientists think that
Dr. Mills claims are preposterous.
Traditional physicists claim that the "ground" state
of the hydrogen atom is the lowest energy state possible.
According to the "experts", all levels of the
hydrogen atom are accounted for in quantum mechanics.
As far as the majority of physicists are concerned,
there is nothing to suggest that other levels exist.
It turns out that a fundamental error in physics
ignored the existence of a second non-radioactive form
of hydrogen which is an inert gas ( just like Orgone,
what a coincidence! <grin>). Low energy hydrogen
can be made from ordinary hydrogen when its electrons
orbit drops to about one twentieth its ² normal ² size.
When this happens ( in a vacuum at about 2,500 deg.
Kelvin with potassium vapour as the catalyst ) the
hydrogen atom release up to one thousand times as much
energy as needed to get hydrogen from water. This means
a lot of energy is available with no pollution at all.
In theory a 200 hp car using this system could go 100,000
miles on the hydrogen in a single tank of water. Art.
B. Rosenblum
The byproduct of Mill's chemical reaction is a hydrino,
the lower energy hydrogen atom. It is chemically inert
and floats into space in much the same way helium (
or Orgone ) in a balloon floats in space. Kendall
Lets sum it up. The creation of hydrinos from hydrogen
create a vast amount of heat and thus useable power.
But what would happen when the hydrinos from the sun
or the Joe cell interact with the water in the motor
and/or the air in the combustion chambers? Under the
influence of a high electrical disturbance eg. spark-plug
or similar, would we get an expansion in the combustion
chamber/s and a resultant drop in temperature? If so
then the hydrinos = Orgone and I have no arguments
with Dr. Mills. I would suggest that you go to the
Blacklight Power site as shown above and make up your
own mind.
|
|
|
|
Alternative Explaination 2 -Muon hydrogen
I quote the following:
The Muonic hydrogen (MUH) group is a research collaboration
of physicists based at http://www.triumf.ca/homepage.html.
The group attempts to understand the reactions involving
muons and different isotopes of hydrogen, as well as
muon catalysed fusion.
A muon is an elementary particle which can have a negative
or positive charge and has approximately 207 times
the mass of an electron. The MUH group works with negatively
charged muons, which carry the same charge as an electron.
These muons are produced at TRIUMF by directing a beam
of hydrogen ions(protons) moving at 3/4 the speed of
light at a target consisting of beryllium or carbon.
In this way particles called pions are produced, and
shortly these pions decay to become muons. Unfortunately
the muon has an average lifetime of 2.2 microseconds
(or millionths of a second), and one challenge when
working with muons is to use them efficiently before
they decay.
There are three isotopes (varieties) of hydrogen atoms.
First there is protium (H), by far the most common
of the three, which has one proton (a massive positively
charged particle) as its nucleus. Then there is deuterium
(D), whose nucleus is made up of one proton and one
neutron (slightly more massive than a proton with no
electric charge) bound together as a deuteron (d).
About 0.015% of all hydrogen atoms in nature are deuterium.
Finally there is tritium (T), with a proton and two
neutrons forming a triton (t) to make up the nucleus.
Unfortunately tritium, though very useful in these
experiments, is radioactive and its safe containment
is a major concern. Any two of these isotopes will
be bound together by orbiting electrons to form a hydrogen
molecule (the most common of which is 2 protiums making
normal hydrogen gas).
Beyond reactions involving muons and hydrogen, the
MUH group is concerned with creating muon catalysed
fusion. Unlike other fusion processes, muon catalysed
fusion can be carried out at room temperatures or (as
is the case in this group) at about 3 degrees Kelvin
(-270 degrees Celsius).
To create muon catalysed fusion, a beam of negative
muons is stopped in layers of solid hydrogen isotopes.
A muon will then replace the electron in a hydrogen
atom. The muon can then bind the two atoms together
in a special muonic molecule or molecular ion. Since
the muon is 207 times as massive as the electron, the
hydrogen atoms are bound together far more tightly,
so that the nuclei can fuse, creating energy and ejecting
the muon.
Theoretically, the same muon could go on to catalyse
many more reactions, creating enough energy for this
process to be used as a power source. However, sometimes
the muon sticks to a charged fusion product such as
an alpha particle, and is lost to the cycle. Over 100
fusions per muon have been recorded in other experiments
but it is estimated that with the current equipment
it would take somewhat more than this in order to "break
even" energy-wise.
The goal of clean, inexpensive energy from this source
may be far in the future if ever attained, so don't
look for portable Muon Catalysed Fusion generators
on the market any time soon.
More information can be found in the MUH contribution
to the TRIUMF
http://www.triumf.ca/muh/doc/annrep/annrep94.ps
http://www.triumf.ca/muh/pics/
http://www.triumf.ca/muh/muh.html
End of quote
So this theory rests on the presumption that if you
put moun-hydrogen in the presence of a spark, then
some of the electrons could replace the muons. The
now normal hydrogen atoms would expand and the spare
muons would decay and the resultant expansion would
do the work. See: http://ourworld.cs.com/elhoreth/hydr.html
Again dear friends we are calling the same rose by
a different name. At the end of the day it does not
matter in the least as to what the name of the force
is as long as we know its cause and not just use the
effect as we have been doing. You will find out that
sooner or later, our scientists will have to admit
that they have no idea as to the causes of our present
forces. Only when we admit that our sum knowledge of
the causes of energies can be written on the head of
a pin with 10 meter high letters, will we start to
really learn. |
| |
| © copyright Alex Schiffer,
1999 |
| |
|
|
To order Alex Schiffer's
book Experimenter's Guide to the Joe Cell, please
contact: Nutech 2000, Box 255, Ivanhoe, Vic.3079,
Australia
email: nutech@arc.net.au
Visa / Mastercard /Bankcard Welcome Published edition
$39.00 + post $3.00 — ( New Zealand $7.50 /Foreign
$9.00 ) ( Less $10 if you purchased the Pre-Pubublication
Edition). Also available on this subject is Barry Hilton's
book 'HOW TO RUN YOUR CAR ON ZERO POINT ENERGY' ($29)
and two videos, Out of the Horses Mouth Tape 1 & 2,
for $25 each. Please add postage. Any one items — Australia
$4.00 / NZ — $7.50 / US + Other — $9.00 Any
2 to 3 items — Aust. $6.00 / NZ — $10.00 /
US + Other — $12.00 Four items — Australia
$8.50 / NZ — $16.00 / US + Other — $20.00 NOTE
PAYMENT DETAILS US orders please pay in US Dollars.
No fee for personal cheques All other foreign orders
please add $9.00 to cover bank fees for personal cheques.
International money orders in Australian currency is
the preferred option for orders other than US.
|
|
